Usulan Alat Ukur Penilaian Praktik Green Supply Chain Pada Asphalt Mixing Plant (Amp) Menggunakan Metode Best Worst Method (Bwm)

Authors

  • Dharma Air Putra
  • Putu Giri Artha Kusuma
  • Femi Yulianti

Abstract

Pembangunan infrastruktur jalan di Jawa Barat meningkatkan permintaan campuran aspal panas (hotmix) yang diproduksi oleh Asphalt Mixing Plant (AMP). Namun, aktivitas AMP berdampak signifikan terhadap lingkungan melalui emisi karbon. Penelitian ini bertujuan merancang sistem pengukuran penerapan Green Supply Chain (GSC) pada AMP menggunakan metode Best Worst Method (BWM). Penentuan kriteria dan sub kriteria dilakukan melalui studi literatur dari jurnal ilmiah internasional, regulasi pemerintah Indonesia. Proses pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui penyebaran kuisioner kepada responden ahli yang dipilih berdasarkan latar belakang profesional di bidang jas konstruksi dan industri AMP Hasil menunjukkan bahwa Green Production memiliki bobot tertinggi, disusul Waste Management Recycling. Sub-kriteria tertinggi adalah Recycling of Production Waste. Hasil pengolahan data menunjukkan bahwa kriteria Green Production memiliki bobot tertinggi sebesar 0,372, diikuti oleh Waste Management Recycling sebesar 0,261, Green Supplier sebesar 0,183, dan Green Transportation sebesar 0,184. Hasil dari penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan kontribusi dalam bentuk alat ukur evaluatif yang dapat digunakan oleh pemerintah daerah dan pelaku industri sebagai panduan pengambilan keputusan serta peningkatan keberlanjutan pada AMP.

Kata kunci— Green Supply Chain, Asphalt Mixing Plant (AMP), Best Worst Method (BWM), Rantai Pasok, Kriteria, Subkriteria

References

Ali, Y., Saad, T. Bin, Sabir, M., Muhammad, N., Salman, A., & Zeb, K. (2020). Integration of green supply chain management practices in construction supply chain of CPEC. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 31(1), 185–200. doi: 10.1108/MEQ-12-2018-0211

Al-Ma’aitah, N. (2018). Green supply chain management (GSCM) practices and their impact on performance: an insight from the jordanian construction sector. International Journal of Construction Supply Chain Management, 8(2), 87–104. doi: 10.14424/ijcscm802018-87-104

Atmaja, J. F. T., Sari, M. W., & Ciptadi, P. W. (2021). Developing application of automatic lamp control and monitoring system using internet of things. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1823(1). doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1823/1/012002

Babashamsi, P., Md Yusoff, N. I., Ceylan, H., Md Nor, N. G., & Jenatabadi, H. S. (2016). Sustainable development factors in pavement life-cycle: Highway/airport review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 8(3). doi: 10.3390/su8030248

Bawornkiattikul, D., Phatrabuddha, N., & Chotigawin, R. (2022). Accommodation Building Designing for Construction Labor Basic Life Quality Promoting. Suan Sunandha Science and Technology Journal, 8(2), 1–10. doi: 10.53848/ssstj.v8i2.213

Chanchaichujit, J., Balasubramanian, S., & Shuka, V. (2020). Multi-objective decision model for green supply chain management. Cogent Business and Management, 7(1). doi: 10.1080/23311975.2020.1783177

Chopra. (2016). Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation (6th ed.). Pearson.

Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega (United Kingdom), 53, 49–57. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009.

Shi, Q., Zuo, J., Huang, R., Huang, J., & Pullen, S. (2013). Identifying the critical factors for green construction - An empirical study in China. Habitat International, 40, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.01.003

Tachizawa. (2015). Green supply chain management approaches: drivers and performance implications. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35, 1546–1566.

Zhang, S., Niu, T., Wu, Y., Zhang, K. M., Wallington, T. J., Xie, Q., Wu, X., & Xu, H. (2018). Fine-grained vehicle emission management using intelligent transportation system data. Environmental Pollution, 241, 1027–1037. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.06.016

Published

2026-04-20

Issue

Section

Prodi S1 Teknik Logistik