The Effect of Corporate Governance on Environmental, Social, And Governance (esg) Sustainalytics Score

Case Study of Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange That Have Been Appraised by Sustainalytics Period 2023

Authors

  • Givanny Yusti Wulandari Telkom University
  • Dwi Urip Wardoyo Telkom University
  • Sri Saraswati Telkom University

Abstract

This research focuses on ESG scores as measured by Sustainalytics in collaboration with the Indonesia Stock
Exchange since 2023. It is unique because it examines the factors influencing the ESG scores of companies assessed
by Sustainalytics. This study aims to examine the effects of board diligence, board gender diversity, and board size,
along with the control variables of age and firm size, on ESG scores. The population of this study consists of 79
companies assessed by Sustainalytics, with a sample of 78 observations selected using purposive sampling. The
analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and cross-sectional multiple regression with Eviews version 12.
This study found that board member diligence, board gender diversity, and board size simultaneously affect ESG
score, with controls for age and firm size. However, board gender diversity has a negative and significant effect on
ESG score, while board member diligence and board size do not have a significant effect. The results suggest that
future research should explore additional variables, such as financial ratios and green investments. For companies, these findings can serve as a basis for improving governance factors that impact ESG score. For investors, ESG
scores assessed by independent institutions can be a crucial factor in making investment decisions.

Keywords-board diligence, board gender diversity, board size, ESG.

References

Abdelkader, M. G., Gao, Y., & Elamer, A. A. (2024). Board gender diversity and ESG performance: The mediating

role of temporal orientation in South Africa context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 440.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140728

Abubakar, R. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: SUKA-Press UIN Sunan Kalijaga.

Al Amosh, H., Khatib, S. F. A., & Ananzeh, H. (2023). Environmental, social and governance impact on financial

performance: evidence from the Levant countries. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 23(3), 493–513.

https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2022-0105

Alhossini, M. A., Ntim, C. G., & Zalata, A. M. (2021). Corporate Board Committees and Corporate Outcomes: An

International Systematic Literature Review and Agenda for Future Research. International Journal of

Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1094406021500013

Al Kurdi, A., Al Amosh, H., & Khatib, S. F. A. (2023). The mediating role of carbon emissions in the relationship

between the board attributes and ESG performance: European evidence. EuroMed Journal of Business.

https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-08-2022-0144

Alsayegh, M. F., Rahman, R. A., & Homayoun, S. (2020). Corporate economic, environmental, and social

sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(9).

https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093910

Andriof, J., Waddock, S., Husted, B., & Rahman, S. S. (2017). unfolding stakeholder thinking theory, responsibility

and engagement Edited.

Arayssi, M., Jizi, M., & Tabaja, H. H. (2020). The impact of board composition on the level of ESG disclosures in

GCC countries. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(1), 137–161.

https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-05-2018-0136

Asogwa, C. I., Ofoegbu, G. N., Nnam, J. I., & Chukwunwike, O. D. (2019). Effect of corporate governance board

leadership models and attributes on earnings quality of quoted nigerian companies. Cogent Business and

Management, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1683124

Birindelli, G., Dell’Atti, S., Iannuzzi, A. P., & Savioli, M. (2018). Composition and activity of the board of directors:

Impact on ESG performance in the banking system. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(12).

https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124699

Cadbury, A. (1992). Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. Gee.

Ellili, N. O. D. (2023). Bibliometric analysis on corporate governance topics published in the journal of Corporate

Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society. In Corporate Governance (Bingley) (Vol. 23,

Issue 1, pp. 262–286). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2022-0135.

Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. Houston (2021). Fundamentals of Financial Management, Concise, 11/E. New York :

Cengage Learning.

Garzón Castrillón, M. A. (2021). The concept of corporate governance. Visión de Futuro, 25, No 2 (Julio-Dic), 178–

https://doi.org/10.36995/j.visiondefuturo.2021.25.02r.005.en

Grannes, W. L. (2023). The Effect of Board Characteristics on ESG Performance: Evidence from Scandinavia.

Hussain, N., Rigoni, U., & Orij, R. P. (2018). Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of

Triple Bottom Line Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(2), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-

-3099-5

Husted, B. W., & Sousa-Filho, J. M. de. (2019). Board structure and environmental, social, and governance disclosure

in Latin America. Journal of Business Research, 102, 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.017

Kamaludin, K., Ibrahim, I., Sundarasen, S., & Faizal, O. (2022). ESG in the boardroom: evidence from the Malaysian

market. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-022-

-2

Kementrian PPN/BAPPENAS. (2024). Beranda - RPJPN 2025-2045. Kementrian PPN/BAPPENAS.

https://indonesia2045.go.id/

Khalid, F., Razzaq, A., Ming, J., & Razi, U. (2022). Firm characteristics, governance mechanisms, and ESG

disclosure: how caring about sustainable concerns? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(54),

–82077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21489-z

Korkmaz, T., & Nur, T. (2023). The Effect of ESG Sustainability on Firm Performance: A View Under Size and Age

on BIST Bank Index Firms. Ekonomi, Politika & Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(2), 208–223.

https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.1278491

Kumari, P. S. R., Makhija, H., Sharma, D., & Behl, A. (2022). Board characteristics and environmental disclosures:

evidence from sensitive and non-sensitive industries of India. International Journal of Managerial Finance,

(4), 677–700. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-10-2021-0547

Manita, R., Bruna, M. G., Dang, R., & Houanti, L. (2018). Board gender diversity and ESG disclosure: evidence from

the USA. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 19(2), 206–224. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-01-2017-

Mohammad, W. M. W., & Wasiuzzaman, S. (2021). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) disclosure,

competitive advantage and performance of firms in Malaysia. Cleaner Environmental Systems, 2.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100015

Muhmad, S. N., Ariff, A. M., Majid, N. A., & Kamarudin, K. A. (2021). Product market competition, corporate

governance and esg. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 17(1), 63–91.

https://doi.org/10.21315/aamjaf2021.17.1.3

Nuhu, Y., & Alam, A. (2024). Board characteristics and ESG disclosure in energy industry: evidence from emerging

economies. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 22(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-02-

-0107

Priyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Sidoarjo: Zifatama Publishing.

Robinson Sihombing, P. (2021). Corat Coret Catatan Statistisi Pemula Penerbit Yayasan Sahabat Alam Rafflesia.

Samara, I., Nandakumar, M. K., O’Regan, N., & Almoumani, H. M. (2023). Governance diversity: Its impact on

strategic variation and results. Strategic Change, 32(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2534

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). An easy way to help students learn, collaborate, and grow.

www.wileypluslearningspace.com

Sugiyono. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sustainalytics. (2021). Morningstar Sustainability Rating Methodology.

Sustainalytics. (2023). Morningstar Sustainalytics. https://www.sustainalytics.com/about-us

Suttipun, M. (2021). The influence of board composition on environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure

of Thai listed companies. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 18(4), 391–402.

https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-021-00120-6

Tamimi, N., & Sebastianelli, R. (2017). Transparency among S&P 500 companies: an analysis of ESG disclosure

scores. Management Decision, 55(8), 1660–1680. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2017-0018

Urip Wardoyo, D., Sarasdheavy Hidayat, N., Haztania, S., & Fadlan Wicaksono, Y. (2022). The Effect of Current

Ratio and Ownership Structure on The Accuracy of Company Financial Reporting. EKOMA : Jurnal Ekonomi,

(2).

Vora, G. (2019). Age of Firms: Irrelevance Proposition. Modern Economy, 10(05), 1446–1478.

https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2019.105097

Wardoyo, D. U., Diva, P., Putra, A., & Aini, C. (2021). The Influence Of Corporate Governance And Audit Quality

On The Intergrity Of Financial Statements (Empirical Study on Transportation Subsector Companies Listed on

the Indonesia Stock Exchange 2018-2019). Jurnal Ilmu Sosial (Vol. 4, Issue 1).

Wardoyo, D. U., & Utami, A. (2024). Effects of Intellectual Capital Disclosure, Return on Assets, on Firm Value, and

Independent Board of Commissioner in Banking Sector: Agency Theory Perspective. Journal of Law and

Sustainable Development, 12(1), e2531. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i1.2531

Weck, M. K., Veltrop, D. B., Oehmichen, J., & Rink, F. (2022). Why and when female directors are less engaged in

their board duties: An interface perspective. Long Range Planning, 55(3).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2021.102123

Yadav, P., & Prashar, A. (2023). Board gender diversity: implications for environment, social, and governance (ESG)

performance of Indian firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(9), 2654–

https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2021-0689

Downloads

Published

2024-10-17

Issue

Section

Program Studi S1 Akuntansi