Pengujian Fraud Diamond Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan
Abstract
This study aimed to examined fraud diamond which is pressure,opportunity, rationalization, and capability in fraudulent financial statement. This type of research that is descriptive verification causality. The unit of analysis is that listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange 2011-2015. The collection data technique is purposive sampling and obtained 35 samples of data. This study uses logistic analysis techniques. The result is pressure, opportunity, rationalization, and capability are effect on the fraudulent financial statement in simultaneousfor Partially ,only leverage which is pressure’s indicator were effect to fraudulent financial statement. Roa, change of receivable, independent, rationalization, and capability were not effect to fraudulent financial statement.. Keywords: fraud diamond, fraudulent financial statementDownloads
References
Albrecht, W. A. (2014). Determian kecurangan laporan keuangan: Pengujian teori fraud.
Daljono, M. M. (2013). Pendeteksian kecurangan laporan keuangan melalui faktor risiko tekanan dan peluang. ISSN : 2355–9357 e-Proceeding of Management : 4(1)April 2017 | Page 426 8 Divani, Y.
Financial Accounting Standards Board. (1978). Statement of financial accounting concepts no. 1, 1–16.
G. (2014). Transformational research of the fraud triangle joseph b.
Ghozali, Imam. (2013). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program SPSS 21, edisi ketujuh. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Gilmore, C. M. (2012). Fraud diamon vs. Fraud Triangle Analist.
Hanum, I. N. (2014). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi fraudulent financial statement dengan perspektif fraud triangle.
Indriantoro, Nur., Bambang Supomo. (2009). Metodologi penelitian bisnis untuk akuntansi dan manajemen, edisi pertama. BPFE Yogyakarta Jonas Mackevičius, L.
Kasmir. (2013). Analisis laporan keuangan. Rajawali.(2016). Pertambangan Batu Bara Diprediksi Kembali Bersinar. Samarinda: Kaltim Post.
Lou, Y.-i. (2009). Fraud risk factor of the fraud triangle assessing the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting.
Pardos, R. W. (2014). Analisis fraud diamond dalam mendeteksi kecurangan laporan keuangan pada perusahaan manufaktur di Indonesia dengan menggunakan fraud score model (tahun 2010–2013).
Ratmono,Dwi, D. Yuvita Avrie dan Purwanto, Agus. (2014). Dapatkah teori fraud triangel menjelaskan kecurangan dalam laporan keuangan. SNA 17 Mataram. Universitas Mataram:Lombok SAS No. 99. Corporate Governance and Firm Performance Advances in Financial Economis, Vol. 13, h. 53–81.
S. (2012). Fraud examination. South-Western.
S. (2015). Analisis determinan financial statement melalui pendekatan fraud triangle.
Santoso, Singgih. (2015). Menguasai SPSS 22. PT Elex Media Komputindo.
Saputra, A. (2010). Great river diputus pailit. detikfinance.
Shelton, Austin. (2014). Analysis of capabilities attributed to the fraud diamond.
Sihombing, K. S. (2014). Analisis fraud diamond dalam mendeteksi financial statment fraud. 1–2.
Skousen, C. J. (2008). Detecting and predicting financial statment fraud: The effectiveness of the fraud triangle and SAS no. 99. 53–81.
Skousen, C. J. and Twedt, Brady James. (2009). Fraud in emerging markets :A cross country analysis.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2013). Statistika untuk penelitian. Alfabeta Susmita Andriani, N.
Wolfe, D. T. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four of element of fraud.
