Interior of Pracimayasa as the Cultural Inheritance of Solo City in Creative Industry

Sunarmi Sunarmi, Bani Sudardi, Pande Made Sukerta, Titis Srimuda Pitana

Abstract

Interior of Pracimayasa as the cultural inheritance of Solo city in creative industry is a cultural studies research. The problem of research was how the preservation of Pracimayasa‟s interior as the cultural pledge building in creative industry. The interior of Pracimayasa as the noble family‟s residence always represents Javanese ethic and etiquette in vis-à-vis to modern life. This research employed critical deconstruction theory supported with visual communication semiotic theory with hermeneutic approach. The study was expected to give the opportunity of developing creativity in interpreting text, the interior of cultural pledge building. Data collection was carried out using observation, interview, document study, and library study. Data validation was conducted using data triangulation. The result of research showed that (1) rationality in modernism resulted in new awareness that interior of Pracimayasa as the cultural heritage became tourist package in dinner or lunch tour in global era interpreted as the recognition through deconstruction process, thereby generating new interpretation and understanding on the interior of Pracimayasa, (2) the characteristics of Pracimayasa‟s interior should be the source of interior designing idea in global era in realizing the concept of interior esthetic balanced and harmonious with its cosmos to achieve the harmonization of civilization in global era.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Sunarmi. at all. 2016. “Modernity Pressure Over Traditionalism

in Tthe Commodification Oof Praci-mayasa Building

Iin Pura Mangkunegaran Surakartaâ€. in Canadian International

Journal of Social Science and Education - Canadian

Research Center for Humanities and Science, Vol 9, Oktober

/209-219/ ISSN 2356-874X.

Sunarmi, at all. 2016. “The Fall of Mangkunegaran „s Political

and Economic Authoritiesâ€. JESOC Journal Oof Education

and Social Science (JESOC) Vol.5, Issue

/Ockt-2016/Hal, pp.:181-186/ISSN2289-9855. (ISSN

-1552).

Piliang, Yasraf Amir. Semiotika dan Hipersemiotika.

Kode, Gaya dan Matinya Makna. Bandung: Ma-tahari. 2012,

Barker, Chris. Cultural Studies Teori dan Praktek (terjemahan:

Tim Kunci Culture Studies Centre). Yogyakarta:

PT. Benteng Pustaka. 2005: 517.

Bungin, Burhan. Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif:

Pemahaman Filosofis dan Metodologis ke Arah Penguasaan

Model Aplikasi. Ja-karta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada. 2003

Ratna, Kutha. Sastra dan Cultural Studies-: -Representasi

Fiksi dan Fakta. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. 2010.

Kleden, Ignas. Sikap Ilmiah dan Kritis Kebudayaan.

Jakarta: LP3ES 1987.

Piliang, Yasraf Amir. Semiotika dan Hipersemiotika.

Kode, Gaya dan Matinya Makna. Bandung: Ma-tahari. 2012,

Fairclough, N. Discourse and Social Change. Chambridge:

Polity Press. 1995.

Supriyanto, He is a Pengageng in Mandrapura office

responable for taking care of all Mangkunegaran‟s assets

(In-terview, March 5, 2015).

Piliang, Yasraf Amir. Tafsir Cultural Studies Atas

Matinya Mak-na.Semiotika dan Hipersemioti-ka-Kode, Gaya

&Matinya Makna Edisi 4. Bandung: Jalasutra. Ma-tahari.

-2012.

Adian, Doni Garhal. “Menabur Kuasa Menuai Wacanaâ€.

Majalah Basis. No. 01-02 Tahun ke 51 Jan-uari - Pebruari

, Hal 42-49.

Ritzer, George., Piliang, Yasraf Amir. Semiotika dan

Hipersemioti-ka-Kode, Gaya &Matinya Makna Edisi 4.Bandung: Matahari. 2012: 143-144. Teori Sosial Postmodern.

Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana. 2003.

Lechte, John. Fifty Key Contempo-rary Thinkers from

Structuralism to Postmodernity. London: Routledge. 2001.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.