Operating System Selection For Information System Practicums: A Comparative Study Of Rocky Linux, Centos Stream, And Ubuntu Using The Analytical Hierarchy Process
Abstract
Technology skills development is provided through practicum in the Information Systems Department. But, the fact that various laboratories need varying tools and configurations in their systems makes it highly inconsistent and can affect the experience of practicum for students. Plus, one of the other purposes of this research is to expose students to different operating systems, particularly by exposing them to Linux based systems as part of an approach to expand the students’ technical skills beyond what is most commonly used such as Windows. Thus, this study aims to identify which is the most appropriate OS to be used in supporting laboratory practicum activities in the Department of Information Systems. The research adopted the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method as its experimental methodology. Of these four criteria, the researcher identified four main categories: compatibility of tools, default system configuration, user experience and performance. The assessment consisted of running each of the practicum modules on three operating systems (Ubuntu, Rocky Linux, and CentOS Stream), noting any issues encountered, as well as a penalty for incomplete modules. The results show Rocky Linux at 58.2%, CentOS Stream at 26.1% and Ubuntu at 15.8%. It was determined that Rocky Linux was the best-suited operating system for use during the practicum, because of its compatibility and performance.
Keywords—Operating System, Practicum, AHP, Compatibility, Linux, Laboratory Evaluation
References
W. P. Neumann, S. Winkelhaus, E. H. Grosse, and C. H. Glock, “Industry 4.0 and the human factor – A systems framework and analysis methodology for successful development,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 233, no. 1, p. 107992, Mar. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107992.
M.-L. Tseng, T. P. T. Tran, H. M. Ha, T.-D. Bui, and M. K. Lim, “Sustainable industrial and operation engineering trends and challenges Toward Industry 4.0: a data driven analysis,” Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1–18, Jul. 2021, doi: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21681015.2021.1950227.
Z. Wang, C. Chen, and Y. Wang, “Reform of Practical Teaching of ‘Linux Operating System Fundamentals’ Under the Background of Emerging Engineering Education,” Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 19–26, Mar. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.26689/jcer.v8i3.6359.
Muhammad Albedri, Yudha Purnama Putra, and Elkin Rilvani, “Analisis Manajemen Proses pada Sistem Operasi Linux : Permasalahan dan Solusi,” Merkurius : Jurnal Riset Sistem Informasi dan Teknik Informatika, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 142–149, Jan. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.61132/merkurius.v3i1.615.
M. Priya, “The LINUX Operating System: An Introduction,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology, pp. 424–432, Jan. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.48175/ijarsct-15272.
Serio, L. (2020). Machine Learning-Based System for the Availability and Reliability Assessment and Management of Critical Infrastructures (CASO). 372, 041. https://doi.org/10.22323/1.372.0041
Minja Marinović et al., “An Intelligent Multi-Criteria Decision Approach for Selecting the Optimal Operating System for Educational Environments,” Electronics, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 514–514, Jan. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14030514.
Z. B. Akhtar, “Operating Systems (OS): An Insight Investigative Research Analysis and Future Directions,” Journal of Technology and Informatics (JoTI), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 58–69, Oct. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.37802/joti.v6i1.637.
S. Goodarzy, M. Nazari, R. Han, E. Keller, and E. Rozner, “SmartOS,” Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGOPS Asia-Pacific Workshop on Systems, Aug. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3476886.3477519.
Z. Zhao, “AI Based Future Development and Case Analysis in the Education Service Industry,” vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1–9, Jun. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.70393/6a69656173.323933.
M. Bhurtel and D. B. Rawat, “Unveiling the Landscape of Operating System Vulnerabilities,” Future Internet, vol. 15, no. 7, p. 248, Jul. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15070248.
N. R. Rahman, None M Furqan Ramadhanu, and None Nurul Salsabillah, “Peningkatan Kompatibilitas Sistem Operasi Windows di Berbagai Perangkat,” Saturnus, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 225–233, Jul. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.61132/saturnus.v2i3.274.
R. Shah and Shatendra Kumar Dubey, “Multi User Authentication for Reliable Data Storage in Cloud Computing,” International journal of scientific research in computer science, engineering and information technology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 82–89, Mar. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.32628/cseit2410138.
L. Hernandez and C. E. U. Rios, “Docker Optimization of an Automotive Sector Virtual Server Infrastructure,” Knowledge Engineering and Data Science, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 71, Jul. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.17977/um018v7i12024p71-85.
Raju, “A Literature Survey on System Security and Network Vulnerability Assessment,” Indian Scientific Journal Of Research In Engineering And Management, vol. 08, no. 04, pp. 1–5, Apr. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsrem29695.
Llorenç Romá and B. Tellenbach, “Secure Operating System,” pp. 115–120, Jan. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33386-6_21.
S. Butler et al., “An Exploration of Openness in Hardware and Software Through Implementation of a RISC-V Based Desktop Computer,” University Library of Skövde (University of Skövde), Sep. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3555051.3555065.
Harika Sanugommula, “The Evolutionary Path and Influence of Linux Operating Systems,” International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, vol. 2, no. 5, Sep. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2020.v02i05.22302.
I. Atanasov, “From Firewall to AI: Strengthening Linux Server Security,” Science, Engineering and Education, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 3–12, Nov. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.59957/see.v9.i1.2024.1.
Sufyan bin Uzayr, Mastering Ubuntu. 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003311997.
G. A. P. Tenaya, I. D. P. G. W. Putra, A. A. G. Ekayana, I. G. M. N. Desnanjaya, and A. A. G. B. Ariana, “Analisis Performansi Dua Sistem Operasi Server CentOS 8 dan Oracle Linux 8 Menggunakan Metode Levene Dengan SysBench,” INFORMAL: Informatics Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 31, Apr. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.19184/isj.v7i1.30172.
L. Ding, W. Zheng, S. Liu, and Z. Han, “Research and Optimization of the Cluster Server Load Balancing Technology Based on Centos 7,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 201–207, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74521-3_23.
“CentOS Bible: Negus, Christopher, Boronczyk, Timothy: 9780470481653: Amazon.com: Books,” Amazon.com, 2025. https://www.amazon.com/CentOS-Bible-Christopher-Negus/dp/047048165X (accessed Jul. 22, 2025).
Valeriu Manuel Ionescu, M. Patel, and Drashti Hindocha, “Alternatives for Running Linux Applications in Windows,” Jun. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ecai46879.2019.9042127.
