Comparative Analysis on Shoelaces Tools Type Magnetic Sho elaces an d Silicone Shoelaces (Case Study: U rban Societies In Early Adult Stages Of Development)

Authors

  • Hammam Faqieh Azzuhdy Telkom University
  • Muchlis Muchlis Telkom University

Abstract

The type of strappy/lace-up shoes have a quite large market range up to nowadays. Along with its high mo-bility as well as supported by the convenience that it is offered to users, sometimes users enforce or modify the usefulnessof shoes itself. Usually this occurs frequently on users within the age of 18-25 years old, or usually called an early adult-hood phase. Mostly unaware, if it is done repeatedly, it can cause trauma to the foot, even to waist and shoulders. Some ofthe innova-tions that are already on the market, such as magnetic Shoelaces and silicone Shoelaces still lacks of itsendurance and strength. The purpose of this analysis to the both of those types of tools is to provide a standard in designingtools in which can simplify the process of wearing strappy/lace-up shoes becomes faster with not forgetting the fittingshoes to the foot itself. The analysis is done using quantitative methods in order to find out the problem in greater depth.On the other hand, this research is analyzed by using comparative method against both types of tools products in order thatthe result of the products can achieve the function that users has expected. The final outcome of this analysis is to produce aguide or term-of-references in designing tools products that can be applied on Shoelaces, which can simplify the process ofusing a strappy/lace-up shoes.

References

Tyrel, & Carter. 2009. Therapeutic Footwear: A Compre-

hensive Guide. 6th ed, United States of America:

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE ELSEVIER.

Polster, Burkard. 2006. The Shoelaces Book: A

Mathematical Guide to the Best (and Worst) Ways to Lace

Your Shoes. United States of America: American

Mathematical Society

Katie Kubesh et al. 2007. The History of Footwear. Coloma:

In the Hand of Child

Diane E Papalia et al. 2014. EXPERIENCE HUMAN DE-

VELOPMENT. McGraw Hill Higher Education

David B. Laha et al. 2016. Proper Shoe Fit: For Support and

Foot Pain Prevention. Kansas: Kansas City Foot Specialist, P.A.

Palgunadi, Bram. 2008. Desain Produk 2: Analisis dan Kon-

sep Desain. Bandung: Penerbit ITB

Palgunadi, Bram. 2008. Desain Produk 3: Aspek-aspek de-

sain. Bandung: Penerbit ITB

Swasty, Wirania. (2010). 99 Inspirasi Warna Interior.Depok:

Swadaya Group.

Nugroho, Sarwo. 2015. Manajemen Warna dan Desain.

Yogyakarta: Andi.

Poespo, Goet. (2000). Dresses. Jakarta:Gramedia

E-Jurnal.

Harlan, Dwimastia. 2014. Pengaruh Kemudahan Penggunaan,

Kepercayaan dan Risiko Persepsian Terhadap Minat Ber-

transaksi Menggunakan E-Banking Pada UMKM di Kota

Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Meikalyan, Rizzal. 2016. Studi Komparasi Standar

Pelayanan Minimal (SPM) Bus Trans Jogja. S2 thesis:

Yogyakarta. Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.

Mujiarto, Imam. 2005. Sifat dan Karasteristik Material Plas-

tik dan Bahan Aditif. Semarang: AMNI Semarang

Hastuti, Wiji. 2009. Studi Komparasi penggunaan metode

STAD dilengkapi modul dengan LKS terhadap Prestasi

Belajar siswa sub Pokok Bahasan Konsep mol semester I

SMA Negeri 1 Manyaran Tahun Ajaran 2008/2009.

Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret

Gilang,

,

Resin

Epoksi,

http://purnama-

bgp.blogspot.co.id/2014/08/resin-epoksi.html,diakses

tanggal 11 juni 2017

Yudie,

,

Pengertian

Utilitas,

http://blog.umy.ac.id/opissen/2012/04/30/pengertian-

utilitas/, diakses tanggal 10 oktober 2016

Kamus Bahasa Indonesia Online, kbbi.web.id

Downloads

Published

2018-03-07