Analisis Perbandingan Performansi Jaringan Wireless Menggunakan Software Iperf dan Wireshark di PT Industri Telekomunikasi Indonesia (Persero)

Penulis

  • Telkom University
  • Telkom University
  • Telkom University

Abstrak

Abstrak — PT Industri Telekomunikasi Indonesia
(Persero) fokus pada solusi performansi jaringan dalam
analisis Quality of Service (QoS). Penelitian ini
membandingkan Iperf dan Wireshark untuk analisis jaringan
dengan parameter throughput, packet loss, delay, dan jitter.
Metodenya adalah analisis statistic selama 7 hari dengan
standar TIPHON. Hasil pengukuran Iperf menunjukkan
throughput 3,841 Mb/s, packet loss 0,286%, delay 1,024 ms,
jitter 0,24 ms dengan indeks <Sangat Baik=. Wireshark
menunjukkan throughput 1,418 Mb/s, packet loss 2,146%, delay
4,095 ms, jitter 4,08 ms dengan indeks <Baik=. Hasil
perbandingan kedua perangkat dengan 10 poin pengukuran
fungsionalitas, Wireshark unggul disbanding Iperf.
Kesimpulannya, keduanya mampu mengukur jaringan sesuai
parameter, tetapi Wireshark lebih unggul. Penelitian ini
memberikan rekomendasi berharga untung pengembangan
jaringan di masa depan.

Kata kunci— Iperf, Wireshark, TIPHON, Quality of Service, komparasi

Referensi

'ulya, N. K., Hernanjaya, A. N., & Nugroho, S.

(2021). PERFORMANSI KUALITAS JARINGAN WIRELESS DI ITS PKU MUHAMMADIYAH. Jurnal JUTITI, 2-8.

A. Gachhadar, M. N. Hindia, F. Qamar, M. H. S.

Siddiqui, K. A. Noordin, and I. S. Amiri, Modified

genetic algorithm based power allocation scheme for amplify-and-forward cooperative relay network,

Computers & Electrical Engineering, 2018.

Brito, I. V. S., & Figueiredo, G. B. (2017). Improving

QoS and QoE through seamless handoff in softwaredefined IEEE 802.11 mesh networks. IEEE

Communications Letters, 21(11), 2484-2487.

D. Melkov, A. Saltis, and S. Paulikas,

Testing of Linux Firewalls,= in 2020 IEEE Open Conference of Electrical, Electronic and Information

Sciences (eStream), Vilnius, Lithuania, Apr. 2020,

pp. 1-4. doi: 10.1109/eStream50540.2020.9108868.

F, G., I, A., & O, A. (2021). Comparative analysis of

network forensic tools and network forensics

processes. Conference procedings.

Kassabi, I.; Abdrabou, A. An Experimental

Comparative Performance Study of Different WiFi

Standards for Smart Cities Outdoor Environments. In

Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 13th Annual

Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile

Communication Conference (UEMCON), New York,

NY, USA, 26-29 October 2022; pp. 450-455.

Karo, F. K., Nugraha, E. S., & Gustiyana, F. N.

(2019). Analisis Hasil Pengukuran Performansi

Jaringan 4G LTE 1800 MHz di Area Sokaraja

Tengah Kota Purwokerto Menggunakan Genex

Asistant Versi 3.18. Teknologi Informasi, 116-124.

M. N. Hindia, F. Qamar, M. B. Majed, T. A. Rahman, and I. S. Amiri, Enabling remote-control for

the power sub-stations over LTE-A networks, Telecommunication Systems, pp. 1-17, 2018.

Muchlisin Riadi. (2019, May 26). Pengertian,

Layanan dan Parameter Quality of Service (QoS).

Kajianpustaka.com; Blogger. www.kajianpustaka.com/2019/05/pengertianlayanan-dan-parameter-quality-of-service-qos.html

[July 9, 2023].

O. Elijah, T. A. Rahman, I. Orikumhi, C. Y. Leow, and M. N. Hindia, An Overview of Internet of Things (IoT) and Data Analytics in Agriculture: Benefits and

Challenges, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2018. [11] Pamungkas, M. P., Iswahyudi, C., & Raharjo, S.

(2021). ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN

##submission.downloads##

Diterbitkan

2024-10-21

Terbitan

Bagian

Program Studi S1 Sistem Informasi