Study on the Identification of Supporting and Obstacle Factors for Achieving Spbe Targets in Tasikmalaya City in 2024
Abstract
The utilization of data and correspondence innovation in government exercises is a type of e-government execution.
The execution of e-government in Indonesia was developed with the issuance of Official Guideline Number 95 of 2018
concerning Electronic-Based Government Frameworks (SPBE). During the 5 years that the guidelines connected with
SPBE were distributed, a few deterrents were found in the execution cycle, guidelines and assets so they couldn't
accomplish the greatest objective. The point of this exploration is to show the estimation cycle of the SPBE
development level record esteem in the Tasikmalaya Regional Government. The examination utilized in this
exploration alludes to PERMENPAN Number 59 of 2020. Comprises of 47 markers that will evaluate development
levels as indicated by current information and conditions. The screening was completed with witnesses or sources
associated with shrewd administration the board in the city of Tasikmalaya to find solutions to every pointer. In light
of the consequences of executing the savvy administration aspect in Tasikmalaya City utilizing the SPBE record, it
shows the reception and execution of inside strategies connected with SPBE engineering, information the executives,
data security, and ICT reviews. Proficient, straightforward and responsive regulatory administrations have been given
to the general population through complex data innovation. The City of Tasikmalaya has prevailed with regards to
building a strong groundwork in the administration of unstable materials with viability, productivity, security and
better help than the local area. Tasikmalaya City, in carrying out the savvy administration aspects, has accomplished
an excellent predicate in the SPBE file, demonstrating that the regional government has taken on a powerful shrewd
administration approach.
Keywords-e-government,smart city, smart governance, SPBE, governance, Tasikmalaya.
References
Agarwal, P. K. (2000). Portals: The path to everything: Government Technology. Www.Govtech.Net.
Almarabeh, T., & AbuAli, A. (2010). A General Framework for E-Government: Definition Maturity Challenges,
Opportunities, and Success. 14.
Alshehri,M., & Drew, S. (2010). E-GOVERNMENT FUNDAMENTALS. 8.
BPK SULSEL. (2020). Penerapan Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik Dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan
Pemerintah Daerah. Subbagian Hukum BPK Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan.
Candiwan, & Wibisono, C. (2021). Analysis of the Influence of Website Quality to Customer's Loyalty on ECommerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies, 12(1).
Kementrian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Dan Reformasi Birokrasi.
Laporan Hasil Evaluasi SPBE 2023 Pemerintah Kota Tasikmalaya
Kementrian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Dan Reformasi Birokrasi.
Cresswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mix Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE
Publications Inc.
Dawson, C. W. (2015). Projects in computing and information systems: A student’s guide (Third edition). Pearson.
Firdaus, M. A. R. (2018). Evaluasi Implementasi Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik (SPBE) Pemerintah
Kabupaten Lumajang Menggunakan Peraturan Menteri PAN-RB Nomor 5 Tahun 2018 Tentang Pedoman
Evaluasi SPBE. Universitas Jember.
Guo, Y. (2010). E-Government: Definition, Goals, Benefits and Risks. International Conference on Management and
Service Science, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSS.2010.5576557
Hapsari, D. W., Yadiati, W., Suharman, H., and Rosdin, D. (2023). The Mediating Impact of Value Chain in The Link
Between Corporate Governance and SOE’s Performance. Australasian Accounting Business and Finance
Journal 17(2), 2023, 75-85.
I Made Sukarsa, Ida Bagus Ananda Paramartha, Anak Agung Ketut Agung Cahyawan, Kadek Suar Wibawa, Putu
Gede Arya Sumertha Yasa, Ni Made Swasti Wulanyani, & Ni Wayan Wisswani. (2020). Evaluation of EGovernment Maturity Models in Sub-District Public Services in Indonesia
Using the SPBE Framework. Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem Dan
Teknologi Informasi), 4(2), 243–253.
https://doi.org/10.29207/resti.v4i2.1825
Kartiningrum, E. D. (2015). PANDUAN PENYUSUNAN STUDI LITERATUR. LEMBAGA PENELITIAN DAN
PENGABDIAN MASYARAKAT POLITEKNIK KESEHATAN MAJAPAHIT MOJOKERT, 9.
Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokasi Republik Indonesia. (2020). PERATURAN
MENTERI PENDAYAGUNAAN APARATUR NEGARA DAN REFORMASI BIROKRASI REPUBLIK
INDONESIA NOMOR 59 TAHUN 2020.
Krisnawati, A., Yudoko, G., Bangun, Y.R. (2015). Modeling an effective corporate social responsibility in alignment
with good corporate governance based on indonesian legal regulations. Advanced Science Letters, 2015, 21(6),
pp. 2100–2104.
Jaringan Dokumentasi dan Informasi Hukum KEMENPAN. Kementrian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan
Reformasi Birokrasi. (2018). PERMENPAN RB Nomor 5 Tahun 2018. PERMENPAN. https://spbe.go.id
Kementrian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi. (2020). Sekilas Peraturan Menteri
PANRB No.59 Tahun 2020. PERMENPAN.
Majidah, Nazar, M.R., Muslih, M., Anggraeni, G. (2016). Earnings quality: Corporate governance perception index,
intellectual capital and spiritual values. Advanced Science Letters, 2016, 22(12), pp. 4338–4340.
Manurung, D.T.H., Hardika, A.L., Hapsari, D.W., Sebayang, M.M. (2018). The role of corporate governance and
environmental committees on greenhouse gas disclosure. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism,
, 9(7), pp. 1403–1413.
Mohammad, H., Almarabeh, T., & AbuAli, A. (2009). E-government in Jordan. European Journal of Scientific
Research, 35(2), 188–197.
Nugraha, J. T. (2018). E-GOVERNMENT DAN PELAYANAN PUBLIK (STUDI TENTANG ELEMEN SUKSES
PENGEMBANGAN E-GOVERNMENTDI PEMERINTAH KABUPATEN SLEMAN). JURNAL
KOMUNIKASI DAN KAJIAN MEDIA, 2, 32–42.
PERATURAN PRESIDEN REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 95 TAHUN 2018.
Pratiwi, H. D., Putra, W. H. N., & Herlambang, A. D. (2020). Evaluasi Penerapan E-Government Di Pemerintah
Kabupaten Sumbawa Besar Menggunakan Kerangka Kerja Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik (SPBE).
, 9. Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2003). Instruksi Presiden Nomor 3 Tahun 2003.
Purnama, P. A. W. (2020). Analisis Dan Evaluasi Tingkat Kematangan E-Government pada Information Architecture
menggunakan Framework Cobit 5 (Studi Kasus: Pemerintah Daerah Kota Padang). 10.
Silalahi, M., Napitupulu, D., & Patria, G. (n.d.). KAJIAN KONSEP DAN KONDISI E-GOVERNMENT DI
INDONESIA. 7.
Sin Tan, K., Choy Chong, S., Lin, B., & Cyril Eze, U. (2009). Internet‐based ICT adoption: Evidence from Malaysian
SMEs. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109(2), 224–244.
https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570910930118
Supriyanto, E. E. (2016). Kebijakan Inovasi Teknologi Informasi (IT) Melalui Program Elektronik Goverment dalam
Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan : Kajian Ilmu Pemerintahan
Dan Politik Daerah, 1, 141–161.
Utami, S. R. (2019). Evaluasi Sistem Pemerintahan berbasis Elektronik (SPBE) pada BDA Sukamandi [Skripsi,
Universitas Widyatama]. https://repository.widyatama.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/11730
Widiyarta, A., Robbani, H. I., & Windiastuti, C. E. (2020). EVALUASI KEBIJAKAN SISTEM PEMERINTAHAN
BERBASIS ELEKTRONIK DALAM PELAYANAN ADMINISTRASI (SIOLA) DI KEMENTERIAN
DALAM NEGERI REPUBLIK INDONESIA. Public Administration Journal of Research, 2(3).
